Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Evidence of God Options · View
Lunger
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:40:41 AM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 1,801
Location: Down Under
Let me start by correcting my earlier statement about “irrefutable evidence”. Obviously anyone can refute information by a simple disagreement. What I have is powerful evidence of the existence of God, and if you truly are interested you can verify my evidence to find that they are, in fact, true.

We should set some ground rules first. If you disagree with anything I state here, that is fine, but you need to back it up with qualified research as I have done. If you want to have additional information but do not want to post it here, you can PM me and I’ll answer as quickly as I can.

Maybe you might be saying to yourself, “I don’t care if there is a God or if Christianity is true or not. I am more concerned if that belief system works for me. I don’t care if it is true. I just want to know if I read up on Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc, will it help me.” If this is your position…

Let me tell you a story about a fictitious character named Bolo. I don't want you to think that he is a real person, so don't get upset. I am going to use him as an example.

Bolo was not the sharpest knife in the drawer. He passed high school with a C average, and decided to go to college and major in physics. In his first exam he gets 3 out of 100 correct. He asked a question of the professor so bad that it hardly had anything to do with the subject at all. It was so bad that the professor decided to make a mockery of him. He gathered all the faculty members and science majors on campus in a secret meeting and said, "Let's mock this dunce, Bolo, during the 4 years he is here. Let’s make him think he’s the smartest student ever at this college.". Everyone agreed, and they all made this guy think he was the smartest guy on campus. He passed all his tests with A's and his peers constantly sought his opinions. After graduation, he decided to get a doctorate in physics. No problem, with a little emailing from his professors, the whole educational community was in on the joke. He finally graduates Summa Cum-Laude. He goes to work for a top ten university. He is frequently consulted by the white house, he oversees a dozen doctoral dissertations each year, he lectures all over the world, and he thinks he is doing a great job. However, he is the laughing stock of the world and people hate his guts. They think he is an idiot and joke.

Here is the question;
Would you want to be Bolo? Would you want your children to have the life of Bolo?

Before you answer let me remind you that Bolo’s beliefs work for him. From the time he wakes up in the morning till he goes to bed he thinks “I’m smart”. My students are lucky to have me. I am doing the world a favor with my lectures. My country appreciates me for what I am doing."

The only problem here is, everything he believes, is wrong!

So if you don’t envy Bolo, there is one thing about a belief that is more important that whether it works for you… and that is whether it is true!
If you are on a quest to know if there is a God and if there is a religion that is most likely to be true compared to the other ones, I want to say to you…. There is a God.

I will give you three powerful reasons why God exists.


"There will always be a place for us somewhere, somehow, as long as we see to it that working people fight for everything they have, everything they hope to get, for dignity, equality, democracy, to oppose war and to bring to the world a better life."
...Harry Bridges
"I'm a working stiff. I just happened to be around at the right time, and nobody else wanted the job."
...Harry Bridges
"No man has ever been born a Negro hater, a Jew hater, or any other kind of hater. Nature refuses to be involved in such suicidal practices."
...Harry Bridges


ILWU - The Muscle that moves the country!
www.engrish.com
Sponsor
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:40:41 AM
Lunger
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:36:07 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 1,801
Location: Down Under
Fact #1

We now know beyond any reasonable doubt that the cosmos began to exist. There is no question as to the physical universe of space, time, and matter began to exist. It has not been here forever. Many scientists have differing opinions as to the age of the cosmos, most in the 15-20 billion years old. But that is not the point here. The point is there is wide spread agreement that space, time and matter began to exist in the past.

But how do we know that? There are 4 pieces of evidence, but I will share 2 with you as they can be quite lengthy and I don’t want to lose anyone to the dry subject matter.

1st piece of evidence:
May years ago scientist discovered a physical law called the 2nd law of thermodynamics. There are a couple of ways to formulate the law, but the law basically says that universe is running out of energy. One way to think of this is that the universe is running out of gas. An example, or analogy, of this is, if I had a coffee cup sitting on a table and you came up and touched it and it was still warm. What could you conclude about this? You could conclude that the coffee cup had not been there very long, certainly not for 50 years or even 5 days. The cup had most likely been there for no more than 20 or so minutes. If the coffee cup had been there for 5 days or more, it would have already gone cold to the touch. The universe is like that coffee cup.
A few years ago Time magazine did an article about how cosmologists think the universe is going to end. There is agreement in the scientific community that sometime in the future, the universe will end. The universe will reach a point of total darkness, absolute cold, and motionless. If the universe is running out of energy, and it has not run out of energy yet… what does that mean, or what is entailed by that? It is entailed that the universe had to have a beginning. Because if the universe had no beginning, and it was running out of energy, it would have reached the point of total darkness and coldness infinitely long ago. British scientist Paul Davies said, “It is as though something or someone put energy into the universe from the beginning, and it has been running down ever since”.

2nd piece of evidence;
Suppose God gave me job of counting because He wanted me to count forever. I could count forever and never reach infinity. In fact I would always be infinitely far away from infinity. You could stop me and I would be able to give you a finite answer of where I was. Lets say I was on 50 million billion quad-zillion and another person gets the same job that I have and he starts counting. I can’t say to him, “I’m closer to finishing than you are”, because we are both infinitely far away from finishing.
What this means is that you can not go from zero to infinity. If you cannot go from zero to infinity that is like trying to jump out of a pit that is infinitely tall. There is no edge to grab onto. The walls go literally forever.
Now if the universe had no beginning, let’s say here is the present moment on the line. Backward on the line is 50 years ago, 500 years ago, 100 million years ago, 50 quad-zillion years ago… how far does this line go? Does this line have an edge on it? NO, because if it had an edge on it… it would be the beginning. That line is infinitely far in the past. This means, to get to the present moment in time, would require the universe to cross an infinite number of earlier moments, which is impossible. That means if the universe where infinitely old, this present moment could never happen.
Because going from zero to positive infinity is as impossible as going from minus infinity to zero. Only going from minus infinity to zero is even worse, because not only can you not finish it, you can’t even get started. Take any number in the past, say 1 million years ago. How many moments would the universe have to cross to get to that point? An infinite number! So take any number in the past, and that moment itself could not be reached. Trying to go from minus infinity to zero is like trying to jump out of an infinitely tall, bottomless pit, there’s no place to even get started. That means if the universe had been here forever, the present moment could never have arrived. Because the present moment is here now, and could only have been preceded by a finite number of earlier moments, which means there had to be a beginning to time.

As Ted Koppel said on Nightline, “Bangs would seem to have Bangers”. If you get the universe coming into existence, it would have to be something “super natural” that caused the beginning of the natural world. Whatever caused the beginning of the space/time world, was not special, was not temporal, and was not physical. It was “super natural”, that means beyond the natural realm. You cannot get time from something that is time-less unless it is the “first mover” or “first cause”. If it has to change before it can produce time, then its changing to produce time would in fact be the first moment. Whatever it is has to produce time without having to change itself first. The only things that can do that is an entity with voluntary free choice, like a person causing their arm to move, you just will it and it happens with no prior cause. The universe had to be created by something non-spatial, non-temporal, non-physical, transcendent to the natural world. That is what super natural means, it has to have the power volitional free choice.

Now this may not be the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob… but its getting close.


"There will always be a place for us somewhere, somehow, as long as we see to it that working people fight for everything they have, everything they hope to get, for dignity, equality, democracy, to oppose war and to bring to the world a better life."
...Harry Bridges
"I'm a working stiff. I just happened to be around at the right time, and nobody else wanted the job."
...Harry Bridges
"No man has ever been born a Negro hater, a Jew hater, or any other kind of hater. Nature refuses to be involved in such suicidal practices."
...Harry Bridges


ILWU - The Muscle that moves the country!
www.engrish.com
Geepster
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:22:57 PM

Rank: Seargent At Arms
Groups: Member , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/28/2007
Posts: 1,846
Location: San Pedro
But...........God has no begining and no ending. There for either
A. God exists and is super-natural
or
B. There is no God, because for God to exist today God would need a beginging, Nothing can exist today without a begining, per augument #2 (unless of course, one belives in the super-natural, assuming I am reading argument #2 correctly)
Although I have faith in the existance of a higher power, I don't think that these arguments are going to sway anybody new to that side.

"Dr. Evil took my Mojo!!!" -Tiger Woods
strohmy
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:38:13 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/30/2007
Posts: 1,417
Location: Lomita
God does not exist in time as we know it.There is no time to God.All these questions and others will be answered in our next life.Ahhh for some of us anyway.

huh wise guy huh certainly

Hell was created for Satan and his angels, only humans are dumb enough to choose to go there.

MRS.SMITH
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:57:28 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/26/2007
Posts: 2,873
Location: Old Town Torrance

so what fricken good does it for "him" to answer it in our next life - that is just ridiculous



“ Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please.”
--Mark Twain


"Rampant crime, not constitutional rights, is the cause of so much social deterioration and grief" ~~ Charleston Heston

Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:08:09 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
so when will lunger start posting evidence? and why do we have to jump between two threads? its stupid.
Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:09:10 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
strohmy wrote:
Ahhh for some of us anyway.


and there you have it.
Lunger
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:15:07 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 1,801
Location: Down Under
I didn't think the pix section was appropriate for this discussion. Anyway, that was only Fact #1. I know that the info listed in Fact #1 is like taking a drink from a fire hose, but that is about as deep as I wanted to take the first piece of evidence. More to follow with facts #2 and #3.


"There will always be a place for us somewhere, somehow, as long as we see to it that working people fight for everything they have, everything they hope to get, for dignity, equality, democracy, to oppose war and to bring to the world a better life."
...Harry Bridges
"I'm a working stiff. I just happened to be around at the right time, and nobody else wanted the job."
...Harry Bridges
"No man has ever been born a Negro hater, a Jew hater, or any other kind of hater. Nature refuses to be involved in such suicidal practices."
...Harry Bridges


ILWU - The Muscle that moves the country!
www.engrish.com
Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:39:22 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
its just that i see no evidence whatsoever. i thought we all knew that we had a beginning. evidence would be proving that its this god you speak of.
Geepster
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:58:24 PM

Rank: Seargent At Arms
Groups: Member , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/28/2007
Posts: 1,846
Location: San Pedro
strohmy wrote:
God does not exist in time as we know it.There is no time to God.All these questions and others will be answered in our next life.Ahhh for some of us anyway.


I know that.....but, me knowing that is not going to convince anybody else of that. That is why i was trying to point out the weakness of the "universe exists in real time, not infinite time" argument. Although the facts seem to be pretty solid from a physics standpoint, I fail to see how these facts will alter the opinion of a person that beleives in the whole "spontaneous universe" thing.

"Dr. Evil took my Mojo!!!" -Tiger Woods
Lunger
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:44:40 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 1,801
Location: Down Under
Fact #2
I think some if not most people are familiar with the SETI project, and/or have seen the movie “Contact” with Jodie Foster. SETI stands for “Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence”. Even though I don’t think SETI will find intelligent life outside of earth, the project is valid scientifically. That is to say, that scientists have set out the rules for finding intelligence in the cosmos. This research program was started at Cornell University by Carl Sagan, astrophysicist. There are several places now where researchers are looking for signals from outer space. If scientists are going to look for intelligent life in the universe, they had to devise a way tell when they find it. Agreed? So far, so good. Scientists did come up with a way to know if they discovered intelligent life in the cosmos. They set a distinction among 3 things.

#1 “Randomness”
Let’s say I tossed a bowl of alphabet soup in the air and it scattered everywhere. So we find a sideways J, an upside down Q, the #7, the square root of -1. This is a random sequence. When programming a computer it would only take 2 instructions. Pick any letter, and repeat. Very simple! If scientists find a random sequence, they ignore it as this does not demonstrate intelligent life.

#2 “Simple Order”
An example of simple order is 1,000 “ME’s” in a row (ie MEMEMEMEMEMEMEME…..). A computer program would require 3 instructions. Pick an M, pick an E and repeat, and there is a repeatable unit, meaning the sequence is iterated. This is even more specific as I instructed the computer to pick specific letters. So there are 4 components to this, #1 it’s specific, #2 it has 3 instructions, and #3 it contains a unit that is repeated, and #4 (This is a hard one) The parts are prior to the whole. Meaning, if I take “ME” #250 out of the sequence, would you agree that ME’s 1 through 249 are unaffected, and ME’s 251 through 1000 are also unaffected? The only thing that happened is that there is now a gap at location #250. This is called the parts being prior to the whole. In other words, the whole is defined by the parts in it. So if we take an “ME” out, it does not really damage the whole. If the SETI researchers saw 1000 ME’s in a row, they would not become concerned or excited over simple order.

#3 “Information”
An example of information is the statement “John loves Mary”. The statement is very specific and not simple. It is complex in that there is quite a bit of information here. There are 15 specific instruction in a row. The “Gettysburg Address” would be much larger. And there is nothing repeated in it. So #1 it is specific, #2 its not simple, its complex, #3 it is not repeatable, and #4 the whole is prior to the parts. Meaning the whole idea came before the selection of the parts. So how do you know when the whole is prior to the parts? If you take a part out, and it destroy or changes the entire whole, then the whole is prior to the parts. So if you change “John loves Mary” to “John loves &ary”, you have garbage. If you change it to “John loves Hary” you end up with a completely different concept or whole.

The SETI project makes an assumption that information only comes from a mind, and this assumption is true! If you discover information coming from outer space, and it is not randomness or simple order, you have to conclude that intelligent mind created that information. This is the very basis of determining intelligent life in the universe. If we find information, it only can come from a mind. In fact, in the movie “Contact”, Jodie Foster discovered the first 20 (or so) prime numbers in a row. If you think about that, it is not random, nor is it a simple order, it contains a whole lot of information.

Now here is the problem. What applies to the SETI project should also apply to the DNA discovery! Because the greatest discovery of 20th century biology is what makes a frogs structure different from an ice crystal or a junk yard is that the junk yard is composed of randomness, the ice crystal is composed of order, and the frog’s parts are composed of information. The biological discovery of information can best be explained if there is an intelligent mind behind the information. Scientists allow this argument, and in fact they need that argument when it comes to the first 20 prime numbers in a row. But when it comes to the massive amount of information in a DNA molecule, scientists don’t like the conclusion, so they don’t follow it there. This is called intellectual dishonesty. The argument is parallel in both cases, and we should conclude that there is a really big, smart, intelligent designer out there.

Living systems are bursting with information.


"There will always be a place for us somewhere, somehow, as long as we see to it that working people fight for everything they have, everything they hope to get, for dignity, equality, democracy, to oppose war and to bring to the world a better life."
...Harry Bridges
"I'm a working stiff. I just happened to be around at the right time, and nobody else wanted the job."
...Harry Bridges
"No man has ever been born a Negro hater, a Jew hater, or any other kind of hater. Nature refuses to be involved in such suicidal practices."
...Harry Bridges


ILWU - The Muscle that moves the country!
www.engrish.com
Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:07:00 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
do me a favor lunger, and just announce when you are going to give this evidence you keep talking about. that will save me the time of reading all this blah blah which does nothing to prove the existence of god.

*footnote added to earlier post...

i would like to add that its great having this discussion with lunger. its a pleasure "battling" with someone who understands that im not being malicious and who doesnt feel the need to call names simply because he disagrees. i know that he knows that i do indeed have an open mind and am willing to listen and also knows if i disagree im gonna be a smartass about it. he absorbs and comes back with his best punch. the way a discussion should be. while the info given so far has not shown me what was promised, it has at least been interesting. i referred it to as blah blah due to the lack of substantiality in backing his claim(in my opinion). i cannot really accuse him of being way out of context and reaching way out there for conclusions like his allies on this site.
Rootofallevil
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:59:13 PM
Rank: Major Contributor
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2008
Posts: 747
Location: Pedro
strohmy wrote:
God does not exist in time as we know it.There is no time to God.All these questions and others will be answered in our next life.Ahhh for some of us anyway.

This is your best argument. Stick with that which cannot be held up to the light of logic and science. This is where religion belongs.

Religion isn't the opiate of the masses......it's the placebo.-Dr. House
You couldn't pour piss out of a boot if the instructions were on the heel.
Rootofallevil
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:01:20 PM
Rank: Major Contributor
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2008
Posts: 747
Location: Pedro
Lunger wrote:
I didn't think the pix section was appropriate for this discussion. Anyway, that was only Fact #1. I know that the info listed in Fact #1 is like taking a drink from a fire hose, but that is about as deep as I wanted to take the first piece of evidence. More to follow with facts #2 and #3.


So, in order to believe in lugies evidence, you must be stupid enough to drink from a firehose.

Religion isn't the opiate of the masses......it's the placebo.-Dr. House
You couldn't pour piss out of a boot if the instructions were on the heel.
Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:27:36 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
Rootofallevil wrote:
Lunger wrote:
I didn't think the pix section was appropriate for this discussion. Anyway, that was only Fact #1. I know that the info listed in Fact #1 is like taking a drink from a fire hose, but that is about as deep as I wanted to take the first piece of evidence. More to follow with facts #2 and #3.


So, in order to believe in lugies evidence, you must be stupid enough to drink from a firehose.


i have to admit, thats kinda funny.
strohmy
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:11:04 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/30/2007
Posts: 1,417
Location: Lomita
MRS.SMITH wrote:

so what fricken good does it for "him" to answer it in our next life - that is just ridiculous



Whats ridiculous about it if you believe in God as I do I know that all my questions will be answered when i stand before him thats if there even important to me at that time which they probably won't be.

huh wise guy huh certainly

Hell was created for Satan and his angels, only humans are dumb enough to choose to go there.

Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:13:11 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
there is a thing out there that knows no time and is the king of infinity, and you will be able to stand in front of him? thats not ridiculous at all.
strohmy
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:16:02 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration , Moderator, Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/30/2007
Posts: 1,417
Location: Lomita
Joe Bogs wrote:
do me a favor lunger, and just announce when you are going to give this evidence you keep talking about. that will save me the time of reading all this blah blah which does nothing to prove the existence of god.

*footnote added to earlier post...

i would like to add that its great having this discussion with lunger. its a pleasure "battling" with someone who understands that im not being malicious and who doesnt feel the need to call names simply because he disagrees. i know that he knows that i do indeed have an open mind and am willing to listen and also knows if i disagree im gonna be a smartass about it. he absorbs and comes back with his best punch. the way a discussion should be. while the info given so far has not shown me what was promised, it has at least been interesting. i referred it to as blah blah due to the lack of substantiality in backing his claim(in my opinion). i cannot really accuse him of being way out of context and reaching way out there for conclusions like his allies on this site.


Joe I love ya brother but I think if God came down from the sky and landed right in front of you,you would look to see if he was wearing a jet pack and then look for the "you've been punk'd cameras".

huh wise guy huh certainly

Hell was created for Satan and his angels, only humans are dumb enough to choose to go there.

Joe Bogs
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:18:31 PM

Rank: Contributing Member
Groups: Moderator , Premium Member, Super Mod, Trusted Member

Joined: 8/27/2007
Posts: 2,652
Location: evergreen
no, but if he told me he was god, i would need to see some id. maybe a miracle or two.

then i would ask him to arrange things so that steadys did not get out before others checked in on the board.

then i would cuss him out for the crappy ass job hes doing down here.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.0 (NET v2.0) - 10/10/2006
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.641 seconds.